Martin Gannon
This week’s class was centered on cultural
metaphors as a way for describing cultures. The two most relevant elements, for
me, were:
Firstly, metaphors are not objective; they come
from the author’s interpretation of experiences and observations rather than
findings through a scientific method. In fact, it is possible to find elements
in other studies as Hofstede’s or Meyer’s which are not coherent with what the
metaphor of a country tells us. And that is why one of the main critics made to
metaphors, and recognized by professor Gannon, is that metaphors incorporate
part of the stereotypes commonly held about a culture, and that can distort the
real cultural profile of a country (however, Gannon argues stereotypes can be
value-adding [1]). So, one of the questions I made myself was: then which study
(Hofstede’s, Meyer’s, Gannon’s, etc) should I choose? Finally, I came up with
the conclusion that they are not mutually exclusive but complimentary, and then
it is important to contrast them in order to find differences and similarities,
getting a wider panorama of the country studied.
Secondly, and since Spain is part of Latin
Europe that is one of the clusters my team will be presenting in class soon, I
found that Gannon presents for both
Spain and Portugal the same metaphor, but amazingly they are very opposite in
their meaning. Whereas in Spain the bullfight represents a tragic and
solemn ritual, in Portugal the bullfight is a party. The Spanish bullfight celebrates
death; the torero shows its domain
over the bull which finally dies. The Portuguese bullfight highlights the courage
and pride of men who face the bull, but the bull’s killing is prohibited. Then,
we can evidence how subjective a metaphor can be, and that it is a very
graphical and exemplifying tool for understanding cultures but can also lose
objectivity.
From my viewpoint, the type of study one
chooses to get information and build a mental picture about another country’s
culture is crucial for negotiating or just to interact with natives from that
culture. Therefore, I consider there should be an appropriate mix of objective
and quantitative information with qualitative and not-very objective
information when looking for information. Metaphors are an example of not-very
objective information on culture that contributes with very valuable elements
of the country’s culture. However, we must be careful in order not to fall in
adopting stereotypes that might be reflected in a metaphor. Then a good judge and criteria are necessary when choosing information sources on cultures and
contrasting them. This is how I think these topics can become relevant in an
international scenario.
Research Question: Who
is professor Martin Gannon?
Despite of being a question easy to answer, I decided
to look for more information about him because I wanted to know how did he come
up with the metaphors for so many countries.
Martin J. Gannon (Ph.D., Graduate School of
Business, Columbia University) is Professor of Strategy and International
Management. Professor Gannon has been a Senior Research Fulbright Fellow in
West Germany, Thailand, London Business School, Italy, Dublin, Poland and has
lectured at many other universities in the world. Professor Gannon has
emphasized three overlapping areas of programmatic research: International
management and behavior; business strategy; and the contingent workforce,
particularly studies of temporary help employment. Much of his work in
international management and behavior is described in depth in the book,
Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 29 Nations,
Clusters of Nations, Continents, and Diversity. His research and writing have
appeared in over 90 articles and papers. Currently Professor Gannon teaches
three courses at California State University: Managing in Different Cultures;
Cross-Cultural Negotiations; and Strategic Management in a Global World.
Professor Gannon has served as a consultant and
trainer to a large number of organizations, including Chemical Bank of New
York, the U.S. General Accounting Office, U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
the Upjohn Company, the American Federation of Government Employees,
ARINC, Northrop-Grumman and GEICO. Professor
Gannon has served on and chaired numerous committees in universities and
professional/academic associations. He
has lived and lectured in over 25 nations for various periods of time extending
from one week to a year or more [2].
References
[1] Professor Heiko Schmidt’s Slides.
Describing Culture: The Case of Spain
[2] California State University San Marcos
webpage. Retrieved from: https://www.csusm.edu/coba/about/meet-our-faculty/gannon.html
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario