viernes, 7 de noviembre de 2014

Week 6: Is globalization a forced acculturation?

Yesterday’s class we took a look on globalization and its increasing impact on cultural identity, in fact, I would say, globalization has turned into a culture itself nobody can escape from since it is a reality we face today. That is why I wanted to give this post the title above. The two aspects I would like to highlight from class are: first, the role of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) in globalization; and second, the hybridization of culture.

MNEs play a fundamental role on how globalization affects and alter cultural identities and that influence can be either positive or negative (unfortunately, being more criticized rather than praised). As a matter of fact, MNEs acts as vehicles through which the culture from one country gets into contact with cultural values from other countries. The example of Coca-Colonization clearly evidences the tremendous impact that a brand can have on the cultural values of a community. I think this is fundamental for us when working in multinational company in order to understand and identify the firm’s corporate culture and how workers and members of the organization adopt it as part of their own cultural identity, to the extent that, when negotiating with other person, we should not only know about its national culture, but also the culture of the company they work for.

The spread of multinational corporations throughout different cultures and nations has contributed to the second relevant topic of the class: the hybridization of culture.  As presented by the teacher, the traditional relation existing between nationality and culture is getting weaker and losing ground in today’s globalized work. Nationality does not seem to be a criterion to define cultural groups anymore.  For example, we can find cultural sub-groups within a same nation as the micro-nations seen in class: Scotland and Québec. But also the cultural clusters identified in some studies such as GLOBE Study (Latin America and Latin Europe, for example). Furthermore, nowadays, we can find new individual cultures which have emerged based on other common values different to nationality as music, social classes, professions, religion and language. For this reason, and as I previously argued, as part of a professional’s cultural abilities, we need to understand and study those cultural sub-groups when dealing with people in an intercultural scenario and not only studying about the culture of their country. It can really make a difference and even be a source of professional competitive advantage.

Research Question: Does the BIG MAC Index really reflect differences in Purchasing Power Parity among countries?

Since we approached the BIG MAC Index in class, I wanted to take this post as an opportunity to share a recent short research I made on the real usefulness of the index to find purchasing power differences worldwide. Next, I present the main conclusion of the work but I attach the file where the complete information is contained.


“The methodology of the Big Mac Index shows Colombia to be quite close to PPP conditions with a historical low deviation and a market exchange rate close to its theoretical level. However, we may make two critiques of this Index: first, it cannot be generalized to the overall level of prices of the economy since we are basing the analysis on only one product. Second, the Big Mac Index does not completely reflects Purchasing Power Parity, it justs shows the purchasing power of the currencies in nominal terms, not real because it does not take into account the income gap existing accross countries. In Colombia, a worker earning a minimum wage (most of the Colombian workers) takes almost 3 hours to earn enough money to buy a Big Mac, it is five times more than what they would take in the United States. In conclusion, even though the Big Mac Index shows the colombian peso is close to Purchasing Power Parity conditions with the dollar and that it is overvalued; in reality, the colombian peso has much less purchasing power than the dollar; in simple words, we could do much more with one dollar in U.S. than what can be done with COP 1.911 (the PPP implied rate) in Colombia.”

Link to the file:



No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario